MİHENK / 001 THRESHOLD

What do we tell ourselves at night?

The room we leave for others in the story we tell ourselves at the end of the day.

Arel’s reflection

CHAPTER 01 / 03

What remains of the day

In the evening, the glasses are cleared from the table. The day’s conversations are not so easily cleared away. A hurried reply, a sentence we interrupted, a message we saw and meant to answer later: as the room returns to order, these things can remain unsettled within us. Sometimes, along with our tiredness, we cover them over.

Our voice changes as we tell ourselves about the day. A remark that sounded harsh to someone else becomes, in our story, a necessary warning. If we kept someone waiting, we had too much to do. We remember more clearly the time they kept us waiting. We do not always do this knowingly. Looking out from within ourselves, we can lose sight of where someone else stands.

In the English rendering of al-Ghazali’s Kīmiyā-yi Saʿādat published as The Alchemy of Happiness, the chapter on self-examination returns to intentions and the actions of the day. This reflection belongs to an account of responsibility before God and the life to come. [1] The question I carry into the present as I read is how the permission we give ourselves is felt in someone else’s life.

CHAPTER 02 / 03

The narrow room of being right

Ending the day by blaming ourselves for everything does not seem like openness to me either. When we look only for faults, we may still fail to see the other person; this time, our own inadequacy fills the room. Sometimes the task is to understand where a remark landed, without reaching a final verdict on who we are.

Finishing our work does not show that no one was hurt. Equally, someone being upset does not oblige us to meet every one of their wishes. It is hard to hold both sides of this. Even in a conversation where we set a boundary, can we remember that a person remains on the other side?

We cannot wipe the scratches from a table every evening. Yet we can choose not to set a glass down so hard the next day. I do not offer this as a perfect analogy for human relationships. An object does not answer; a person has a voice, wishes, and sometimes the right to leave. We cannot decide alone how something we want to mend should be mended.

CHAPTER 03 / 03

What we can carry into tomorrow

Perhaps the space an evening opens is small. Enough to step out from behind an excuse and say more simply what we did. Enough, when apologising, to leave room for what the other person heard, rather than giving a long account of our good intentions. And to bear the possibility that forgiveness may not come straight away.

I sometimes think of love this way: loosening our wish to look good at all times beside the person we love. Staying present when we cannot find a sentence to defend ourselves. Without taking on the whole weight of a relationship, not running from the part that belongs to us. Less a grand moment of purification than a small difference in how we behave the next day.

Night does not bring the day back. But perhaps we need not carry only our own rightness into tomorrow. In the story we tell ourselves tonight, where do we put the words of the person we hurt?

Sources
  1. Gazâlî · The Alchemy of Happiness, Chapter VI: Concerning Self-Examination and the Recollection of God (Claud Field aktarımı) ↗

First published: 2026-09-28